Error matrix

Introduction

When spatial data are collected in the field, it is relatively easy to check on the appropriate feature labels. In the case of remotely sensed data, however, considerable effort may be required to assess the accuracy of the classification procedures. This is usually done by means of checks at a number of sample points. The field data are then used to construct an error matrix (also known as a confusion or misclassification matrix) that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of the classification. An example is provided in the Table below, where three land use types are identified. For 62 check points that are forest, the classified image identifies them as forest. However, two forest check points are classified in the image as agriculture. Vice versa, five agriculture points are classified as forest. Observe that correct classifications are found on the main diagonal of the matrix, which sums up to 92 correctly classified points out of 100 in total.

Table: Example of a simple error matrix for assessing map attribute accuracy. The overall accuracy is (62 + 18 + 12) ∕ 100 = 92%.
Classified image Reference data  
  Forest Agriculture Urban Total
Forest 62 5 0 67
Agriculture 2 18 0 20
Urban 0 1 12 13
Total 64 24 12 100

Learning outcomes

Incoming relations